Legal Opinion

Equitable Trust Co. v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 30, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, Judge,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The legal principles applicable to this case are so well settled that a mere summary of them will suffice; in fact, there seems to be no real difference of opinion on the part of counsel concerning those principles. It should be said that we are not here concerned with the equitable rules pertaining to fraud or mistake, as our examination of the matter is limited to the question of whether or not a valid and enforcible contract to bequeath has been satisfactorily established.

Equity will enforce a valid contract to make a will, usually by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chalfant v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921
  2. Rash v. Equitable Trust Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. TaylorCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1975
  2. Snyder v. Baltimore Trust Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Shepherd v. MazzettiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Southeastern Chester County Refuse Authority v. BFI Waste Services of Pennsylvania, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API