Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Nedtvedt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1936No. File No. Cr. 131Published

1DissentBurr, J.

The defendant was convicted of engaging-in the liquor traffic as a second offense. She was sentenced to a term in the penitentiary and appeals.

The only specification of error necessary to consider is the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The defendant lived alone in a four-room apartment in Fargo. At 1 P. 3VI. of August 31, 1934 her home was visited by two police officers and two deputy sheriffs, armed with a search warrant. When they arrived they found the defendant in her kitchen, busily engaged in canning fruit, and talking with the man whom she afterwards married —at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keifner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Shell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. State v. SternNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. West and RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API