Legal Opinion

Kenyon v. Newton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and judgment granted declaring that Nemyier is a covered person under Newton’s New York Central policy. Memorandum: In a previous appeal in this case, we held that the liability provisions of the insurance policy issued by defendant New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company to defendant Marion V. Newton remained in full force and effect at the time of the accident (see, Kenyon v Newton, 115 AD2d 291, mod 117 AD2d 1022, lv dismissed 67 NY2d 605). The issue raised on this appeal is whether the policy issued by New York Central covers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Sperling v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. People ex rel. Miranda v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Kenyon v. NewtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Kenyon v. NewtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nationwide Insurance v. ToblerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Amica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Hartford Insurance v. HaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API