Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Railing v. Hawkins

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 2001No. 72A01-0009-JV-324Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSharpnack, C.J.

I fully concur with the majority's decision to reverse and remand so that the trial court may enter findings of fact and conclusions thereon as to Father's overtime income. I disagree with the majority on the question of Father's gross weekly income.

The trial court issued findings and conclusions with regard to Father's gross weekly income. When reviewing the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions thereon, we consider the evidence that supports the judgment and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. Scott v. Scott, 668 N.E.2d 691, 695 (Ind.Ct.App.1996). We must affirm the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Harris v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API