Legal Opinion

Ciba Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 30, 1964No. Reap. Dec. 10787; Entry No. 919158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WmsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement was submitted upon the following written stipulation entered into between the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorney for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, defendant, that:

*3611. The merchandise at bar consists of Neolan Flavine GFE 24%, a coal tar dye, exported from Switzerland, during the first half of the calendar year 1959.

2. “Neolan Flavine GFE 24%” appears on the final list, T.D. 54521, preceded by an asterisk (*), which asterisk indicates that the article thus marked…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ciba Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ciba Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API