Legal Opinion

Estate of Baldridge

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1954No. Civ. 19829PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

The petitioner is a nephew of Dora M. Baldridge. He sought to have her declared incompetent and a guardian appointed for her person and estate.

After hearing the evidence, the trial court found that Mrs. Baldridge “is competent to manage her own person and her household affairs and expenses” and denied the petition for guardianship of her person.

The court also found that “Dora M. Baldridge is incompetent by reason of old age, physical illness and infirmity rendering her unable, unassisted, properly to manage and take care of her property, and by reason thereof is likely to be deceived or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Crocker First National Bank v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Schulmeyer v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Guardianship of WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Katz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. In Re the Alleged Incompetency of ArmstrongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. In Re GUARDIANSHIP of FRANKNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Schmidt v. FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API