Legal Opinion

Poyser v. Peerless

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 2002No. 49A05-0108-CV-352PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Karen Poyser filed a defamation lawsuit against St. Richard’s School, her former employer, David Peerless and Claudia Hil-ligoss, her supervisors at the school, the St. Richard’s Board of Directors, and Karen Dorfman, president of the Board (collectively referred to as “the School”). The School moved for summary judgment, which motion was granted by the trial court. Poyser now appeals the summary judgment against her. We affirm.

Issues

Poyser raises three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as one: whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. William F. Buckley, Jr. v. Franklin H. LittellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Barry M. Goldwater v. Ralph Ginzburg, Warren Boroson, and Factmagazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. Journal-Gazette Co. v. Bandido's, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ricky W. Beauchamp and Beth E. Beauchamp v. City of Noblesville, Indiana, Cynthia Dukette, Joe Cook, Hamilton County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Filippo v. Lee Publications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2007
  3. Lovings v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Shine v. LoomisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Nikish Software Corp. v. Manatron, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API