Legal Opinion

Manning v. Joseph

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners, ninety-three in all, are stationary engineers (electric) employed in various departments -and agencies of the city of New York. They seek additional compensation, pursuant to the prevailing rate of wages under section 220 of the Labor Law, for work performed on late shifts and on Sundays between January 14,1944, and May 22,1947. We agree with the courts below that the reversal (Matter of Smith v. Joseph, 275 App. Div. 201, affd. 300 N. Y. 516) of the comptroller’s original 1947 determination, excluding these shift differentials, inures to the benefit of all the stationary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Smith v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Dinan v. PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rosen v. New York City Teachers' Retirement BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Carroll v. GrumetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. John F. Cadwallader, Inc. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Kunz v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Bonfiglio v. ProcaccinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API