Legal Opinion

Alberty v. Wideman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 5, 1993No. 92-1172PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

We dismiss this appeal without prejudice. The parties to this case are two orthopedic surgeons who entered into a partnership agreement in 1981 to own office space in a condominium office building and to own certain items of medical equipment, office equipment, and office furnishings in Fort Smith. In 1987, appellee notified appellant of his intention to retire from his medical practice and, pursuant to the partnership agreement, offered appellant the right to purchase the partnership property. Over two years later, the partnership still had not been terminated, so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Festinger v. KantorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Fratesi v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Parker v. Bodcaw BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chambers v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Scherz v. Mundaca Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. McAdams v. Automotive Rentals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Martin v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Budget Tire & Supply Co. v. First National Bank of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API