Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Finlen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1902No. 1,784PublishedCited by 4 opinions

OeigiNal mandamus by the state, on tlie relation of Miles Finlen, against the district court of the Second judicial district of Montana and others.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

Application for mandamus. In a cause pending in the district court of Silver Bow county, entitled “Miles Finlen v. F. Aug. Heinze et al.," after a trial by the court without a jury, finding's of fact and conclusions of law were made on June 18, 1901, in favor of the defendants. Judgment was entered thereon July 11, 1901. Within the time allowed by the statute, and in conformity with its requirements, the plaintiff prepared his motion for a new trial, basing the same upon a statement of the case and upon affidavits. The statement was properly settled and filed with the clerk. • The affidavits…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Raleigh v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Donovan v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Symons v. BunnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rowe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State Ex Rel. Sanders v. HillMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State ex rel. Gibson v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Scollard v. Board of Examiners for NursesMontana Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API