Legal Opinion

ACKRON CONTRACTING CO. v. Oakland County

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1978No. Docket 77-4155PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.

Counter-defendant appeals from the entry of a default judgment in favor of defendant. Default judgment was entered due to counter-defendant’s noncompliance with court-ordered discovery. GCR 1963, 313.2(2)(c).

Our examination of the record convinces us that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering default judgment. Two notices to produce documents and tangible things were filed by defendant. Counter-defendant ignored these notices. The trial was adjourned four times, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, so that discovery could be completed. Never were the requested documents…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. First Bank of Cadillac v. BensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Ackron Contracting Co. v. Oakland CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Philips Industries, Inc v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. ACKRON CONTRACTING CO. v. Oakland CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API