Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Bradford

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1844PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the District Court for Iowa County. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This suit was brought in the district court for Iowa county, by the defendants in error as indorsees, against the plaintiff in error as indorser of a certificate of deposit, of which this is a copy :

*391“Bank of Mineral Point, { June 4, 1841. j

70 dollars.

John P. O ’Neill has deposited in this office $70 to his own account, subject to his order on return of this certificate ninety days after date, in specie.

(Signed) POETEE BEACE, Teller.”

The declaration contains averments of an indorsement at the date of the certificate to the plaintiff, and a demand and notice usual in a declaration in a suit by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commercial Bank v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Corser v. CraigU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1806

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Curran v. WitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Grobe v. RoupWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API