Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Heghmann v. Indorf (In Re Heghmann)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit

Decided May 5, 2005No. BAP No. NH 03-073, Bankruptcy No. 03-12162-MWVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BOROFF, U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in the majority’s presentation of the fact pattern and in its well-reasoned holding that a bankruptcy debtor’s appellate filing fees may be waived where the debtor demonstrates both an inability to pay the filing fees and objective good faith. I also agree that the necessary element of good faith is absent where the appeal is frivolous. Unfortunately, however, I part company with the majority’s conclusion that the appeal here can be so characterized.

The critical elements of the fact pattern, which…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Soares v. Brockton Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Paul J. Grella, Trustee v. Salem Five Cent Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Menk v. Lapaglia (In Re Menk)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API