Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Texarkana, Shreveport & Natchez Railway Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1900No. 13,426PublishedCited by 10 opinions

PPEAL from the Eirst Judicial District, Parish of Caddo — Land,

1Opinion of the Court

Statement op the' Case.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the respondent, in his capacity of president of the Board of Commissioners of the Caddo Levee District of Louisiana, to obey the resolution of said hoard, and to sign, as such president, a deed to the relator for the lands described in accordance with and embodying the terms and provisions of same.

The respondent resisted the allowance to relator of the relief sought, and filed an extended return,

Upon the issues thus joined, the judge a quo made the writ of mandamus peremptory;…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smit v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. State Ex Rel. Lowentritt v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Dauenhauer v. RossnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. Saint v. Mayor of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. Martin v. BaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API