Legal Opinion

Weisfuse v. Wagner (In re A. H. Robins Co.)

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 24, 1997No. 85-01307-RPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*811 MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Movant Martin A. Weisfuse’s (‘Weisfuse”) Motion To Set Attorney’s Fees At 10% On Pro Rata Distributions. Respondent Roxanna Wagner (Wagner”) objects to the Motion. The Trust takes no position with respect to this matter. The parties have not asked to be heard on the Motion and the matter is ripe for disposition. For the reasons which follow, the Court will deny the Motion.

I

Weisfuse, an attorney of the law firm of Weisfuse & Weisfuse, was retained by Wagner in 1985 for the purpose of representing Wagner in her claim against…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Smith (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API