Legal Opinion
Delaware, Lackawanna and Western RR Co. v. Neeld
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 11, 1957PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
In purported compliance with the mandate of L. 1952, c. 229, N. J. S. A. 54:294-17, the defendant *565Director of the State Division of Taxation, some time prior to December 10, 1955, determined the “true value” of Class II railroad property of the plaintiff Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company situate in the cities of Hoboken, Jersey City and Newark and the Town of Secaueus, as of January 1, 1955, for the assessment of the 1956 tax; and the valuations were later sustained by the Director after hearing held under N. J. S. A. 54:29A-18…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision of Tax Assessments in Greene Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Central RR Co. v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Continental Paper Co. v. Vil. Ridgefield Pk.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.