Legal Opinion

Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 1992No. 1909 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Public utility Duquesne Light Company (Duquesne) petitions for review of the August 20,1991 order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which sustained the formal complaint of customer/ratepayer Elmer Jonnet (Ratepayer) against Duquesne and held that Ratepayer did not owe Duquesne $366.03 for electric service furnished to 127 Monticello Drive, Monroeville, PA, between July 8 and October 28, 1986. We affirm.

On December 5,1988, Ratepayer filed an informal complaint with the PUC pursuant to the PUC’s regulation at 52 Pa.Code § 56.162 and averred a billing dispute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. BakerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. W.C. McQuaide, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Vacation Charters, Ltd. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gurfein v. Sovereign GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Exxon Pipeline v. La Public Service Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. RMBM Corp., Inc. v. G. Harkins, Code Enforcement Dept. HeadCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API