Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A.M.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2006No. 03-0509PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina

In this case, we must decide under what circumstances a parent, who has been ordered to pay periodic child support, may raise the affirmative defense of Texas Family Code section 157.008 to a suit to collect that support. The statute provides that an obligor parent, who by agreement has possessed a child for periods exceeding court-ordered possession, and who has provided actual support for the child during such period, “may request reimbursement for that support as a counterclaim or offset against the claim of the obligee [parent].” TEX. FAM. CODE § 157.008(d). The court of appeals concluded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beck v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  2. Gonzalez v. Tippit, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re AMTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. HB Turbo, L.P. v. Turbonetics Engineering and Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
  3. In the Interest of S.D.S., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2025
  4. in Re Reza ZandiTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. in the Interest of D.M.S., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API