Legal Opinion
In Re the Twenty-Fourth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 6, 2006No. 120, 121 MM 2006PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
Lancaster Newspapers, Inc. and a reporter have filed an application for review challenging a grand jury subpoena requiring the production of computer hardware. The application was styled as an emergency, which we will address on the present submissions. We also consider the Office of Attorney General’s challenge to an order requiring disclosure of the notice that it used to submit the underlying investigation to the grand jury.
In February and July 2006, Lancaster Newspapers, Inc. was served with two subpoenas issued under the authority of the Twenty-Fourth Statewide…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Thirty-third Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- In Re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re Estate of StrickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Law Office of Douglas T. Harris v. Philadelphia Waterfront Partners, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.