Virginia Transformer Corp. v. P.D. George Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, Chief Judge.
Before me is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The parties have fully briefed the issues involved and I have entertained oral argument. The motion is therefore ripe for disposition. For the reasons contained herein, I am of the opinion that defendant’s motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
This is a diversity product liability case. Plaintiff Virginia Transformer (“V-Trans”) manufactures electrical transformers. During production the core and coil assembly of the transformers are together immersed in a varnish,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Frank Brunckhorst Co. v. Coastal Atlantic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
- Stoney v. FranklinSuffolk County Circuit Court · 2001
- Waytec Electronics Corp. v. Rohm & Haas Electronic Materials, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
- R & D DISTRIBUTING CORP. v. Health-Mor Indus., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.