Legal Opinion

People v. Daniel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 11, 2008No. 4-06-0658PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myerscough

Defendant, however, failed to seek leave to file the petition prior to filing his successive petition. Including a request for leave to file a successive postconviction petition within the second postconviction petition does not comport with the statutory requirement that a petitioner seek leave prior to filing a successive postconviction petition (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1(f) (West 2006)). Therefore, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In August 1991, the State charged defendant with three counts of first degree murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1(a)(1), (a)(2)) arising out of the death of Earley…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. PitsonbargerIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. LaPointeIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. DeBerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. CollierAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. People v. LusbyIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  4. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API