Southern Pacific Co. v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COM'N

I dissent from the majority opinion.

In this case the Southern Pacific Company is asserting the right to discontinue half of its trans-continental train service through Arizona without notice to the Arizona Corporation Commission, as required under A.R.S„ § 40-367 (1956) et seq. and .the Commission’s General Order No. U-8, and without notice to the Interstate Commerce Commission or to any public authority. In eliminating the east and west ■bound passenger trains the railroad is flying in the face of well settled principles of public utility law which have existed at least since the days of…