Legal Opinion

Long Island Lighting Co. v. Voehl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The proof establishes, and the board has found, that a substation of the nature proposed is needed to enable the petitioner to provide adequate electric service to its customers. The zone in which the site of the proposed substation is located is the least restricted district in the village. In said zone, there are permitted, as a matter of right, such uses (among others) as hand laundries, dry-cleaning establishments, shirt laundries, carpenter shops, cabinet making shops, furniture and upholstery shops, metal working establishments, machine shops, blacksmith shops, tinsmith shops, leather…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Long Is. Lighting v. Griffin, Fyfe's ShipyardNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Long Island Lighting Co. v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Long Island Lighting Co. v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Long Island Lighting Co. v. VoehlNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Summit School v. NeugentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API