Mann v. Schultz
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, J.,
Defendants, Ivan Schultz and Michael Schultz, t/a 1000 Washington Associates and Have-A-Vend Inc., have filed a motion for post-trial relief. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
*65The factual history in this matter is as follows. Plaintiff, Raymond Mann, was employed by Have-A-Cup as a truck driver and delivery person. Ivan and Michael Schultz, as individuals, own a warehouse facility which houses two companies, Cup and Have-A-Vend. Both Cup and Vend are owned by Ivan and Michael Schultz, t/a 1000 Washington Associates.
On the morning of February 14, 1994, Mann arrived at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Whistler Sportswear, Inc. v. RulloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Montgomery v. South Philadelphia Medical Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Doe v. RaezerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Weidemoyer v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.