Legal Opinion

Armatas v. Aultman Hosp. (In re Haas)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2017No. 17–AP–088PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO'Connor, C.J.

*1264{¶ 1} Plaintiff Steven A. Armatas, who is representing himself and his father's estate in the underlying civil action, has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court under R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge John Haas from presiding over any further proceedings in the matter.

{¶ 2} In March 2017, Mr. Armatas filed a complaint in this court for a writ of prohibition against Judge Haas seeking relief from one of the judge's legal rulings in the underlying case. The judge, through his counsel from the Stark County prosecuting attorney's office, moved to dismiss Mr. Armatas's complaint.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Goodwill Industries of Akron, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Buckingham Coal Co. v. SantoOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re Disqualification of FlanaganOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armatas v. Aultman Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API