Bailey v. Beadles
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oase 1 — ATTACHMENT— appeal prom graves circuit court. CITED 17 B. Monroe, 542, Taylor v. Smith. 3 Metcalfe, 279, Pool v. Webster. 1 Metcalfe, 471, Worthington v. Cary. 2 Duvall, 488, Anderson v. Sutton. CITED % Metcalfe, 88, Riggs y. Maltby & Co.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LINDSAY
delivered the opihtou op the court.
Beadles & Bolinger brought their action at law against Bailey, and sued out an order of general attachment against his property upon the ground of non-residency, and the same was regularly levied upon a tract of land owned by him. Orders of warning were properly taken, and the various provisions of the Code of Practice regulating such proceedings were substantially complied with, and the land levied on adjudged to be sold in satisfaction of plaintiffs’ claim. The grounds of attachment were attempted to be set out in the petition, there being no…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Clolinger v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Cornett v. GreeverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940