Legal Opinion

Carter v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 2007No. COA06-1517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Judge.

On 21 July 2006 plaintiffs filed a Complaint in Summary Ejectment against defendants, alleging that defendants failed to pay $990 in rent and owed $500 for damage to plaintiffs’ property. The magistrate found that defendants owed $840 in past-due rent but also that plaintiffs had breached the warranty of habitability and owed defendants $175 per month rent abatement for the fourteen months defendants lived in the house. Defendants appealed the magistrate’s judgment to the district court and filed an Answer and Counterclaims in response to the Complaint for Summary…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LEYSHONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Servatius v. RyalsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API