Fechheimer, Frenkel & Co. v. J. M. Ball & Bro.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 766. Attachment; petition need not he sworn tOj when, etc. The petition was not sworn to, but the affidavit for the attachment contained all the material sub- ■ stantive matters set forth in the petition, and this was. sufficient. [Schrimpf v. McArdle, 13 Tex. 368; Primrose v. Roden, 14 Tex. 1; Morgan v. Johnson, 15 Tex. 569.] The court erred in sustaining the defendant’s motion to quash the attachment.

§ 767. Beconvention in attachment suit; requisites of; plea in, should distinguish hetiveen actual and exemplary.,, damages. Upon a plea in reconvention the ■ appellees…