In re the Construction of the Will of James
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
George Fraukeuthaler, S.
The court has undoubted power to allow to any party to the proceeding reasonable counsel fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with the judicial construction of the will by this court and the appellate courts (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 278). Matter of Hayden (200 Misc. 758) is not authority to the contrary. In that case, petitioners were not mentioned in the will, their status was immediately challenged, their efforts to prove their interest by extrinsic evidence were wholly unsuccessful, and their petition for construction of the will was dismissed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Estate of AhrensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- In re the Construction of the Will of HaydenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Estate of GibsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Construction of the Will of GriffingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
- In re the Estate of BergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
- In re the Estate of StormNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.