State v. Vorgvongsa
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1DissentMurray, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the trial justice’s decision in granting the defendant’s motion for a new trial. As with the majority, I too accept the trial justice’s findings of credibility, but I do not believe that the trial justice abused his discretion. I do not find that the trial justice’s decision was clearly wrong or that he misconceived or overlooked a material fact.
This court has clearly delineated the function of a trial justice when considering a motion for a new trial. When deciding a motion for a new trial, the trial justice begins by undertaking a three-step analysis…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. BanachSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- State v. MariniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Welsh Manufacturing, Division of Textron, Inc. v. Pinkerton's, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- State v. DameSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.