Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mueler v. Murphy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1987No. 53270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Relator sought a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent from proceeding in a will contest because of failure of plaintiffs to obtain service on a named defendant in the suit. That defendant was a legatee under the will under attack and therefore a person whose interest would be adversely affected by the result of the will contest. He was therefore a necessary party. See Sec. 473.083.3 RSMo 1986.

The will contest was filed on November 5, 1986. Plaintiffs filed an affidavit for service by mail as to six defendants including Leonard Hoctor residing at 3723 “W” Street, Omaha, Neb.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Central Wholesale Distributors, a Division of Topeka Lumber, Inc. v. DayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Stemmler v. CrutcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Collier v. DunneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kreisel v. WischmeierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Jones v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API