Legal Opinion

Summit v. Mudd

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1984PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from an order entered by the Court of Appeals denying Summit’s petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition, whereby he sought relief from the trial court’s refusal to disqualify the entire Commonwealth Attorney’s office for Jefferson County, from prosecuting his case. Summit is charged with second-degree burglary and second-degree persistent felony offender.

The issue is whether the ethical rules, case law and statutory considerations require that the entire office of the Commonwealth Attorney be disqualified from participating in the prosecution of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barnett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Sanborn v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. CamachoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. McManusSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. Whitaker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API