Legal Opinion

Protest 106438-K/91444 of MacEachern

United States Customs Court

Decided May 9, 1945No. 50174PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

The assessment of duty here in question was levied upon a fur coat which came into the possession of the plaintiff upon the death of his sister who lived in Canada. The plaintiff claims that the coat is exempt from duty under the third proviso of paragraph 1798, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

At the trial the plaintiff testified concerning the facts as follows:

I had an invalid sister — she was ill for years — and I was called to Toronto on Monday, January 13th, when she died, in a sense unexpectedly; though she was very ill, we thought…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wall v. BissellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saterlie v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API