Legal Opinion

United States Casualty Co. v. Bliss

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1934No. 2360Published

1Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

Decided- May 28, 1934

By THE COURT

■ An application designated motion for rehearing ^as sent to each member, of this court by counsel-.for plaintiff in error.

We have a communication from counsel for defendant in- error in which we are .cited t-o Rule 13 and it is ■ claimed that its provisions were not observed., JWhile, technically, . this is. true, yet, substantially, the motion complies with the rule as it contains a memorandum and was filed in time. We, therefore pass upon the questions presented.

The application presents two grounds for rehearing: First, that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Physicians' Defense Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  2. Physicians' Defense Co. v. CooperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API