Kent v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

We have again reviewed the entire record in the light of appellant’s motion, and his insistence that he should have been-given a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We have to confess that we have rarely seen a case of circumstantial evidence manifesting as much thoroughness in its preparation and in the presentation of'its many strong links in the chain of circumstances, as the one before us. Many of these circumstances are set out in our former opinion, but many others could be iterated. For instance and as shedding light on the…