Legal Opinion
Nanyuan Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Marimed Agencies Uk
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 22, 2009No. 08 Civ. 9861(VM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
On November 14, 2008, plaintiff Nan-yuan Shipping Co. Limited (“Nanyuan”) applied ex parte for an order for process of a maritime attachment (the “Attachment”) against then-defendants Liana Carriers Inc. (“Liana Inc.”) and Marimed Agencies UK (“Marimed”), pursuant to Rule B (“Rule B”) of the Supplemental Admiralty Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims. See Fed.R.Civ.P. Supp. R. B(l). The Court granted the Attachment.
Nanyuan subsequently discovered, however, that the entity Liana Inc. did not exist and was named in error. Nanyuan…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aqua Stoli Shipping Ltd. v. Gardner Smith Pty Ltd., Docket No. 05-5385-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TpiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Seawind Compania, S.A. v. Crescent Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Marimed Shipping Inc. v. Persian Gulf Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- China National Chartering Corp. v. Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Alaska Reefer Management LLC v. Network Shipping Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014