Legal Opinion

Ainslie v. Eason & Waters

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Hart. Morgan superior ■court. September term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

Ainslie and Almand entered into a written •contract under seal, whereby Ainslie granted to Almand permission to erect a storehouse upon the land of Ainslie, and .agreed that Almand should have the use of the property, free •of rent, so long as he desired to use it, and that when Almand “and his successors” failed to use it as a business-house Almand should have the privilege of selling or removing the building. Relying upon this agreement, Almand erected a store upon the land and carried on his business therein for some time. Subsequently he conveyed his right or privilege to Eason & Waters,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southwestern Railroad v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Sheffield v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  3. Rawson v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blackwell v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Cherokee Mills v. Standard Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Dunkley Co. v. California Packing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Bell Industries, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Waters v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API