Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. City of Austin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1984No. 12-83-0094-CVPublished

1DissentColley, Justice

I respectfully note my dissent. I would sustain appellants’ second point of error by which appellants claim that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to award lump sum attorneys’ fees. I have no quarrel with the rule that a trial judge has discretion independent of the jury in workers’ compensation death benefits cases to determine both the amount and the method of payment of the beneficiary’s attorneys’ fees. I do not agree with the holding made by the majority that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to award lump sum attorneys’ fees.

The posture of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Latham v. Security Insurance Co. of HartfordTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ClapperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. DrydenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. AMERICAN STATES INS. CO. OF TEXAS v. CaddellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API