Legal Opinion

Caldarera v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1931No. 14702Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

In the motion for rehearing, counsel for the appellant, Sam Murphy, earnestly contends that the evidence before the jury reflected by the record is not sufficient to meet the,-measure required by law to establish the offense of conspiracy. The statutes applicable are articles 1623, and 1624, P. C., 1925, which read as follows:

“The offense of conspiracy is complete, although the parties conspiring do not proceed to effect the object for which they have so unlawfully combined.”
“Before a conviction can be had for the offense of conspiracy, it must…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Odneal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Whitford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API