Crowe v. De Gioia
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
90 N.J. 126 (1982)
447 A.2d 173
ROSE K. CROWE, A/K/A ROSE K. DE GIOIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SERGIO DE GIOIA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 12, 1981.
Decided July 8, 1982.
Anthony B. Vignuolo argued the cause for appellant (Borrus, Goldin & Foley, attorneys).
Carl J. Palmisano argued the cause for respondent (Palmisano & Goodman, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.
The basic issue on this appeal is whether temporary relief can be awarded in a suit to enforce an agreement between unmarried cohabitants. The Chancery Division awarded…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Crowe v. De GioiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Steiner v. SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Massari v. EinsiedlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Citizens Coach Co. v. Camden Horse RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.