Legal Opinion

Crowe v. De Gioia

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 8, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

90 N.J. 126 (1982)

447 A.2d 173

ROSE K. CROWE, A/K/A ROSE K. DE GIOIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

SERGIO DE GIOIA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 12, 1981.

Decided July 8, 1982.

Anthony B. Vignuolo argued the cause for appellant (Borrus, Goldin & Foley, attorneys).

Carl J. Palmisano argued the cause for respondent (Palmisano & Goodman, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

The basic issue on this appeal is whether temporary relief can be awarded in a suit to enforce an agreement between unmarried cohabitants. The Chancery Division awarded…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Crowe v. De GioiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Steiner v. SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Massari v. EinsiedlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Citizens Coach Co. v. Camden Horse RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API