Legal Opinion

54-55 Street Co. v. Torres

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 17, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated July 17, 1996 affirmed, with $10 costs.

*238We reject, as did Civil Court, the jurisdictional argument raised by the commercial tenants in defense of this holdover proceeding. While the tenants in their moving papers below appropriately conceded the validity of the landlord’s cure and termination notices (dated Apr. 4 and Apr. 15, 1996, respectively), tenants nonetheless argued that the landlord’s initial March 25, 1996 notice of default was a "nullity” because signed by the landlord’s managing agent, rather than a principal of the corporate landlord itself. The…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Yui Woon Kwong v. Sun Po EngAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashley Realty Corp. v. KnightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. White Angel Realty v. Asian Bros.Nassau County District Court · 2000
  3. Kesselman v. London Paint & Wallpaper Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2016
  4. Ohday Realty Corp. v. LuponeCivil Court of the City of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API