Legal Opinion

Abdullah v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 12, 1996No. 96-2102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

679 So.2d 846 (1996)

Saboor ABDULLAH, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-2102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 12, 1996.

Saboor Abdullah, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

2Per curiam

We affirm the summary denial of Abudullah's motion filed pursuant to Florida Criminal Rule of Procedure 3.800(a). Claims relating to whether a plea has been voluntarily entered or effective assistance of counsel must be raised in a Florida Criminal Rule of Procedure 3.850 motion. See Maddox v. State, 673 So.2d 198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Nowlin v. State, 639 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nowlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Maddox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Hilliary v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Spangler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API