Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Repository, Div. of Thompson Newspapers, Inc. v. Unger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1986No. 85-1718Published

1ConcurrenceCelebrezze, C.J.

I completely agree with the result and exemplary reasoning of our per curiam opinion. Unquestionably, the persuasive federal authorities cited therein compel our conclusion in these troublesome cases. The artfully written majority opinion provides a balanced solution which will not inhibit the exercise of discretion by Ohio’s able trial judges; rather, its tenor will merely ensure that such discretion is responsibly made, well chronicled and consistent with the sacred guaran-' tees of Ohio’s Constitution.

Although federal law is consonant with our holding, “* * * it is well to remember that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. English v. McCrarySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. Cowley v. PulsiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API