State ex rel. Repository, Div. of Thompson Newspapers, Inc. v. Unger
Ohio Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceCelebrezze, C.J.
I completely agree with the result and exemplary reasoning of our per curiam opinion. Unquestionably, the persuasive federal authorities cited therein compel our conclusion in these troublesome cases. The artfully written majority opinion provides a balanced solution which will not inhibit the exercise of discretion by Ohio’s able trial judges; rather, its tenor will merely ensure that such discretion is responsibly made, well chronicled and consistent with the sacred guaran-' tees of Ohio’s Constitution.
Although federal law is consonant with our holding, “* * * it is well to remember that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- English v. McCrarySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Cowley v. PulsiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.