Wiser v. Lawler
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the. Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.
On and prior to the twelfth day of May, 1892, John Lawler and Ed. W. Wells were the owners and in possession of the mines and mining claims located in the Eureka mining district in Yavapai County, Arizona, known as “Hillside,” “Happy Jack,” “Contact No. 1,” Contact No. 2,” and “Camp,” and locations known as “Midnight,” “Morning Glory,” “Water,” “Hidden Treasure,” “Sucker,” “Side,” “Purple Rose,” “Southern Belle,” “Robert E. Lee,” “Lucky Cuss,” “Centipede,” and “Good Enough,” which are hereby denominated and will be hereinafter referred to as the “Hillside group of mines.” The muniments of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- County of Pinal v. HeinerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Scarry v. EplerArizona Supreme Court · 1914