Legal Opinion

Cook Export Corp. v. King

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

This action was brought by the appellant to recover corporate franchise and excise taxes, interest and penalties paid by it under protest for the years 1972 and 1973. Appellant asserts that it was improperly assessed the taxes on income attributable to *898its parent corporation, that the sums assessed do not constitute “net earnings” within the meaning of the excise tax statute, that the excise and franchise tax schemes suffer numerous constitutional infirmities as applied to it, and that any tax due the state should be determined according to the statutory apportionment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. v. ChumleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  3. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corporation v. Loren L. Chumley, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  4. Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API