Legal Opinion

People v. Presha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: It was not an abuse of discretion for the suppression court to preclude cross-examination of a police witness concerning acts committed by the "hit squad”, to which the witness occasionally was assigned (see, People v Chatman, 186 AD2d 1004). The extent of the cross-examination of a witness concerning collateral issues designed only to impeach that witness’ credibility is within the sound discretion of the court (see, People v Sorge, 301 NY 198, 201-202). In our view, the court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to allow cross-examination of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. People v. ChatmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. McKenzieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. PerottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. SaddlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API