Legal Opinion

Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2009No. 2008-0895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 486,

2009-Ohio-3626.] NISKANEN, APPELLEE, v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 486,

2009-Ohio-3626.] Civil actions — Negligence — Damages — Punitive damages are not recoverable without award of compensatory damages — Presence of actual malice does not entitle party to recovery of punitive damages if no compensatory damages awarded — Self-defense is available as defense to negligence action if relevant and evidence supports it. (No. 2008-0895 — Submitted April 22, 2009 — Decided July…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. RobbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Malone v. Courtyard by Marriott Ltd. PartnershipOhio Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Singletary v. Super Store Express, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API