Legal Opinion

Ledgerwood v. Lansdowne

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 9, 2004No. 21171-1-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— The central question presented by this appeal is whether the Washington constitutional grant of original jurisdiction to the superior courts includes original jurisdiction of antiharassment proceedings (chapter 10.14 RCW). We conclude that it does. Although RCW 10.14.150 gives the district courts jurisdiction to consider antiharassment petitions, we conclude that this jurisdiction is not exclusive. We therefore affirm the Garfield County Superior Court’s imposition of an antiharassment order on Ron Hansen, an employee of Jacqueline Lansdowne.

FACTS

Jacqueline Lansdowne owns land in Garfield…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Shoop v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Spokane v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wimberly v. CaravelloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Wimberly v. CaravelloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Worden v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API