Legal Opinion
In re Rust
New York City Family Court
Decided February 2, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichards W. Hannah, J.
These cases present two problems: first, what constitutes proper questioning of juveniles by the police, and the question of whether Miranda v. Arizona (384 U. S. 436) is applicable to children who are respondents in this court. It is of the utmost importance to Juvenile Court Judges to know the present attitude of appellate courts on these problems. Accordingly, it is the court’s hope that an appeal will be taken so that these issues can be decided with finality for future guidance.
The respondents, Clarence Billings, age 9, Andrew Rust, age 10, and Robin Alexander, age 12, are alleged to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In the Interest of K. W. B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- In re Fred S.New York Family Court · 1971
- In re WalshNew York City Family Court · 1969
- In re Michael E.New York City Family Court · 1971
- In re Christine H.New York Family Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.