Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hendrieth v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1970No. 45557Published

1DissentRodgers, Justice

I am constrained to disagree with my astute colleagues in their decision in the above and foregoing cause of action against George Hendrieth, alias George Taylor, because I am firmly of the opinion that the following instruction is erroneous:

“The court instructs the jury for the state that malice aforethought mentioned in the indictment in this case may be presumed from the unlawful and deliberate use of a deadly weapon.”

As I see it, this instruction is not only erroneous, but is harmful and reversible.

This instruction has had a long and turbulent history shown by the judicial opinions of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Head v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hawthorne v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Raines v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hydrick v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Patty v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1921

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API